Short answer: Civil Code section 53.8 states that it "shall be known, and may be cited, as the No Kings Act." The official code annotation reads: "Added by Stats. 2026, Ch. 752, Sec. 2. (SB 747) Effective September 29, 2026."
The text of Civil Code section 53.8
Section 53.8 reads in full:
(a) This section shall be known, and may be cited, as the No Kings Act.
(b) Every natural person who, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of this state or any person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the United States Constitution, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in the officer’s judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable.
(c) (1) A defendant in an action brought under subdivision (b) may assert, and shall receive the benefit of, a defense of absolute or qualified immunity only to the same extent as a person sued under Section 1983 of Title 42 of the United States Code under like circumstances.
(2) Nothing in this section shall be construed to make a defense described in this subdivision broader or narrower than that defense would be if asserted under like circumstances in an action under Section 1983 of Title 42 of the United States Code.
(3) This subdivision applies only to proceedings brought under subdivision (b), and does not alter, amend, create, or support a qualified or absolute immunity defense, or any rule or decision governing such a defense, in any other action or proceeding brought under any other provision of California law.
(d) Nothing in this section shall be construed to waive or abrogate any defense of sovereign immunity otherwise available to a party. This subdivision applies only to proceedings brought under subdivision (b), and does not alter, amend, create, or support a sovereign immunity defense in any other action or proceeding brought under any other provision of California law.
(e) In any action or proceeding brought under this section, the court, in its discretion, may award a prevailing plaintiff reasonable attorney’s fees and costs, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in the officer’s judicial capacity, the officer shall not be held liable for any fees or costs, except if the officer’s action was clearly in excess of the officer’s jurisdiction.
(f) A civil action brought under subdivision (b) shall not be commenced later than two years after the date that the cause of action accrues.
(g) The provisions of this section are severable. If any provision of this section or its application is held invalid, that invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application.
(h) (1) This section shall apply retroactively to March 1, 2025, provided that, for any claim for a violation of the United States Constitution that occurred between March 1, 2025, and the effective date of this section, the only monetary damages that shall be available pursuant to this section for that constitutional violation are nominal and compensatory damages.
(2) (A) An action shall not be brought under this section by or on behalf of an injured party if, before the effective date of this section, a court of competent jurisdiction entered a final judgment on the merits determining either of the following:
(i) Whether the conduct complained of deprived that party of rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the United States Constitution.
(ii) The person whose conduct is complained of did not violate clearly established constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known at the time of the conduct complained of.
(B) For purposes of this paragraph, a judgment is not a judgment on the merits if it rested on the absence or unavailability of a cause of action or remedy for the alleged deprivation, rather than on a determination described in clause (i) or (ii) of subparagraph (A).
(3) Paragraph (2) supplements, and does not limit or displace, any otherwise applicable law governing claim or issue preclusion.
(i) For purposes of this section, both of the following definitions apply:
(1) “Color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage” includes color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of the United States and of any state or territory or the District of Columbia.
(2) “Natural person” does not include a federal, state, or local official who is sued in their official capacity for monetary relief.
The text of 42 U.S.C. section 1983
Subdivision (c) of section 53.8 refers to "Section 1983 of Title 42 of the United States Code," as does Section 1(b) of Senate Bill 747, quoted below. That federal statute reads in full:
Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer's judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable. For the purposes of this section, any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a statute of the District of Columbia.
The March 1, 2025 date in subdivision (h)
The official code annotation gives section 53.8 an effective date of September 29, 2026. Subdivision (h)(1) provides:
(h) (1) This section shall apply retroactively to March 1, 2025, provided that, for any claim for a violation of the United States Constitution that occurred between March 1, 2025, and the effective date of this section, the only monetary damages that shall be available pursuant to this section for that constitutional violation are nominal and compensatory damages.
Subdivisions (h)(2) and (h)(3) are quoted in full above. The Legislative Counsel's Digest states: "The bill would specify that these provisions apply retroactively to March 1, 2025, as provided." It also states: "This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute."
Section 1 of Senate Bill 747
Section 2 of the bill added section 53.8. Section 1 reads in full:
SECTION 1. (a) It is the intent of the Legislature that the cause of action created by subdivision (b) of Section 53.8 of the Civil Code, as added by this act, does “not provide for any substantive rights” Chapman v. Houston Welfare Rights Organization, 441 U.S. 600, 617 (1979). It is intended “only to ensure that an individual had a cause of action for violations of the Constitution” (Id.), and no other substantive law. Thus, “[a]ll civil suits . . . which this [a]ct authorizes, are not based upon it” (Id.), they are based on a person’s rights under the Constitution of the United States.
(b) It is the intent of the Legislature that the defense of absolute or qualified immunity available under subdivision (c) of Section 53.8 of the Civil Code, as added by this act, to any defendant, including a federal, state, or local official, be identical to the defense available to a person sued under Section 1983 of Title 42 of the United States Code under like circumstances, and that the defense reflect future developments in the law of immunity under that section so that the defenses remain identical. However, nothing in this legislation is intended to alter or amend current statutory or decisional law regarding application of qualified or absolute immunity to any other provision of California law.
(c) It is the intent of the Legislature that nothing in this act is intended to alter or amend current statutory or decisional law regarding Section 52.1 of the Civil Code.
(d) The Legislature recognizes that a violation of the United States Constitution is an essential element of any action brought under Section 53.8 of the Civil Code, as added by this act, and that such actions therefore necessarily present questions of federal constitutional law. Nothing in this act shall be construed to limit, constrain, or weigh against the exercise of any right of removal that exists under federal law. This subdivision shall not be construed to express any intent of the Legislature respecting the proper forum for, or the removability of, any other action or proceeding brought under any other provision of California law. No inference regarding the state’s interest in the adjudication of any other action or proceeding in the courts of this state shall be drawn from this act.
Enactment record
The official history of Senate Bill 747 (2025–2026 session; lead authors Senators Wiener and Wahab) records these steps, among others:
- February 21, 2025: introduced in the Senate.
- June 5, 2025: "Ordered to inactive file on request of Senator Wiener."
- September 12, 2025: taken from the inactive file and amended.
- January 13, 2026: Senate Judiciary Committee, "Do pass" (Ayes 11, Noes 2).
- January 22, 2026: Senate Appropriations Committee, "Do pass as amended" (Ayes 5, Noes 2).
- January 27, 2026: passed the Senate (Ayes 30, Noes 10).
- June 9, 2026: Assembly Judiciary Committee, "Do pass as amended" (Ayes 9, Noes 3).
- August 13, 2026: Assembly Appropriations Committee, "Do pass as amended" (Ayes 11, Noes 4).
- August 25, 2026: passed the Assembly, with the urgency clause adopted (Ayes 57, Noes 19).
- August 27, 2026: Assembly amendments concurred in by the Senate (Ayes 30, Noes 10); urgency clause adopted.
- September 2, 2026: enrolled and presented to the Governor.
- September 29, 2026: approved by the Governor; chaptered by the Secretary of State as chapter 752, Statutes of 2026.
Section 52.1 of the Civil Code, named in Section 1(c) of the bill, and section 1983 are discussed in the guide to the Bane Act, the Ralph Act, and Section 1983. The full bill and its Legislative Counsel's Digest are linked under Sources.
Questions about a specific incident can be sent through the contact form.
Sources
- Civil Code section 53.8 (added by Stats. 2026, ch. 752, SB 747; effective September 29, 2026)
- Senate Bill 747 (2025–2026), chaptered text and Legislative Counsel's Digest (chapter 752, Statutes of 2026)
- Senate Bill 747 (2025–2026), bill history (dates and votes)
- 42 U.S.C. section 1983 (quoted in full; referred to in section 53.8(c))