If a police officer used force against you at a protest, arrested you for filming, or violated your constitutional rights — you have legal options. This office exists to enforce them.
If Your Rights Were Violated
Submit Your Contact Info
If LAPD or LASD arrested or struck you while you were protesting, submit your contact information so this office can stay in touch with you.
Contact the Office →Preserve Your Evidence
Save everything: photos of injuries, video footage, witness contact information, medical records, and any official communications. Do not delete anything.
Know Your Deadlines
Claims against California government entities typically require a tort claim within six months. Federal § 1983 claims have a two-year statute of limitations. Act quickly.
Civil rights litigation throughout California
Section 1983 claims against law enforcement officers and agencies for unconstitutional stops, searches, arrests, and use of force.
Representation of journalists, photographers, and protesters whose rights to observe and record police have been violated.
California Public Records Act writ proceedings to compel disclosure of law enforcement records, body camera footage, and surveillance data.
Class litigation challenging systemic police conduct, including protest-related force and patterns of constitutional violations.
Bane Act, Ralph Act, and § 1983 claims against LAPD, LASD, and other agencies for protest-related arrests, detentions, and use of force.
Criminal defense and civil rights representation, including infraction defense, ADA accommodation requests, and anti-homeless enforcement challenges.
Weston Rowland is a civil rights plaintiffs' attorney based in Santa Monica, California. He practices as a solo practitioner and as an attorney at the Law Office of Carol A. Sobel, one of California's most established civil rights practices.
His cases have included class actions arising from police use of force at protests, First Amendment retaliation claims against LAPD and other agencies, CPRA writ proceedings to compel disclosure of law enforcement records, and criminal defense for unhoused individuals.
He runs a legal clinic serving unhoused clients in Los Angeles and has experience practicing in the Ninth Circuit.
"That's not how the First Amendment works… The solution is to stop indiscriminately shooting at people, stop interfering with free press, and follow the law."— Weston Rowland, quoted in The Southlander
Weston Rowland named as co-counsel, with Carol Sobel, in the LA Press Club and Status Coup suit against LAPD over unlawful use of force against journalists.
Counsel in the related suit against LA County and LASD over injuries to journalists covering protests.
Representing The Southlander in First Amendment litigation against the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department.
Listed among counsel for the plaintiffs in press freedom litigation against LAPD.
Named among co-counsel in litigation over LAPD's treatment of journalists at protests.
This office represents people whose rights have been violated — not agencies or institutions. Every case is approached from the standpoint of the individual.
From § 1983 claims to CPRA writ proceedings, the work spans the full arc of civil rights litigation in California state and federal courts.
In addition to litigation, Weston runs a legal clinic serving unhoused clients in Los Angeles — because access to justice matters beyond the courthouse.
"The right to observe and record police activity in public is a clearly established First Amendment right."— Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
Potentially, yes. Federal law (42 U.S.C. § 1983) allows civil claims against officers and agencies for constitutional violations, including excessive force. California law provides additional claims under the Bane Act and Ralph Act. Deadlines are short — claims against California government entities generally require a government tort claim within six months of the incident.
Yes. The First Amendment protects the right to observe and record police performing their duties in public, and California Penal Code § 148(g) confirms that recording alone is not a basis for arrest. If you were arrested, detained, or had force used against you for filming police, you may have a civil rights claim.
Claims against California government entities typically require a government tort claim within six months. Federal § 1983 claims are generally subject to a two-year statute of limitations. Acting quickly preserves both evidence and legal options.
The California Public Records Act (CPRA) — including SB 1421 and AB 748 — requires disclosure of certain police personnel records and critical-incident footage. When agencies refuse to produce records, a CPRA writ petition can compel disclosure. This office litigates CPRA matters against law enforcement agencies.
Preserve everything: photos of injuries, video footage, witness contact information, medical records, and any official communications. Write down what happened while it is fresh. Then contact a civil rights attorney promptly, because the deadlines for claims against government entities are short.
Civil rights attorneys — specifically plaintiffs' lawyers who litigate under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and related state laws. Weston Rowland Law is a civil rights practice in the Los Angeles area focused on police misconduct, protest-related claims, First Amendment retaliation, and public records litigation.
What the First Amendment and Penal Code § 148(g) protect, what officers cannot do, and your options if you were arrested for recording.
Read the Guide →The evidence to preserve, the six-month government claim deadline, and the § 1983 and Bane Act claims that may apply.
Read the Guide →Using the CPRA, SB 1421, SB 16, and AB 748 to obtain footage and misconduct records — and what to do when agencies refuse.
Read the Guide →Reach out to discuss your matter. Initial contact is available for potential clients with civil rights claims.
Briefly describe your situation and this office will be in touch.
Not legal advice. The information on this website is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for advice regarding your individual situation.
No attorney-client relationship. Contacting this office does not create an attorney-client relationship. Nothing on this website constitutes an offer to represent you.